Showing posts with label Chinese economy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Chinese economy. Show all posts

30 April 2014

祖國加油!!!!!



As the Fairbank Report correctly forecasted back in 2010, China's GDP will overtake that of the USA by 2015.  Another win for the Fairbank Group's economic predictions!!!!

祖國加油!!!!!

15 January 2011

Yet again, the West is making love to China for her $$$



from the Los Angeles Times

China moves to prop up Europe's economy

The Asian nation pledges to buy billions of dollars' worth of bonds in European Union governments to restore confidence in the debt-ridden region. The EU is China's biggest trading partner.

  • Related
  • Photos
la-fi-china-euro-20110115

Growing into its role as a global economic power, China is pledging to buy billions of dollars' worth of bonds in European governments to help restore confidence in the debt-ridden region.

The move is the latest evidence that the giant Asian nation is developing ties with strategically important trading partners and expanding its influence in areas where it has long played a minor role.


Save 50% on today's deal: $10 for Comfort Fare at Dinah's in Glendale. Tasty and delicious.

In what European media have dubbed a charm offensive, Chinese Vice Premier Li Keqiang was all smiles on a recent swing through the continent, assuring the Germans that their economy was complementary to China's and praising the Spanish as good friends.

He also dispensed plenty of largess, promising to aid the souring economies of Spain and Portugal — pledges that were seen as more than just goodwill.

If Beijing wants its economy to keep flourishing, China can't afford the collapse of the euro any more than the nations that use it. The European Union is China's biggest trading partner, and China is the EU's second-biggest export market.

That adds impetus for helping the Spanish consumers who buy Chinese-made clothes and other exports or the German firms that provide Chinese manufacturers with the sophisticated equipment they need.

"There are mutual benefits behind China's diplomacy where both sides can win," said Huo Jianguo, president of the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, a think tank under the Ministry of Commerce.

China already has significant holdings of European debt. In Spain alone, it owns 43 billion euros ($57.3 billion) in that country's debt — about a fifth of existing Spanish bonds.

On Thursday, Spain easily raised 3 billion euros ($3.9 billion) in a debt auction that was a key test of investor confidence, and Italy sold 6 billion euros ($7.8 billion) in medium- and long-term bonds. The offerings came a day after Portugal conducted a successful bond sale.

It wasn't immediately known how much debt China bought, but the nation wasn't alone. Japan, for instance, also has said it would buy European government debt.

Still, China's foray into the European crisis underscores the growing influence that Beijing's deep pockets play.

Portugal's finance minister, Fernando Teixeira dos Santos, met with Chinese banking and finance officials in Beijing last month to promote the sale of Portugal's debt. The heavily indebted country has resisted calls for an EU bailout despite record yields for its bonds — a sign of how risky investing in Portugal remains.

In Spain, where unemployment hovers at 20%, domestic media reported that China had offered to buy 6 billion euros more in government bonds. On Li's trip this month the two countries signed business deals worth more than $7 billion.

Alfredo Pastor, an economics professor at the IESE Business School of the University of Navarra in Barcelona, said China's intervention to help prop up Spain sent a strong signal to other investors that Spain was a safe bet.

"China has very deep pockets," Pastor said. "If you can see on the other side somebody who's willing to sustain the paper, then your urge to short it may be lower, [and that] may contribute to stabilizing the situation."

Experts warn, however, that China's largess alone is not large enough to resolve the worsening state of many European balance sheets.

"This can help on the margins, definitely, but that's not what's going to shift the balance," said Antonio Garcia-Pascual, chief economist for southern Europe at Barclays Capital in London. "While the Chinese announcement is welcome, it's not a solution."

Countries on the EU's so-called periphery, such as Ireland and Greece, in addition to Spain and Portugal, are deeply troubled financially. Reversing their downward spiral would require not only hundreds of billions of dollars but also new growth drivers to build the nations out of debt.

"It's a solvency crisis," said Michael Pettis, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and a professor at Beijing's Peking University specializing in financial markets. "And you can't keep borrowing yourself out of insolvency.

The stakes are far lower for China, which stands to gain a great deal from stronger political ties with Europe but risks only a small portion of its foreign reserves, which amounted to a record $2.8 trillion at the end of 2010.

Beijing has been trying to diversify its foreign holdings after being criticized both at home and abroad for sinking too much into U.S. Treasury bills. An estimated two-thirds of its investments are denominated in dollars, with the rest in Japanese yen and euros.

On China's wish list is an entree into European markets. The U.S. has often proved to be unfriendly territory, evidenced by failed bids by Chinese firms to gain inroads in oil and telecommunications.

Beijing wants Europe to lift its arms trade embargo and give China access to leading technology to boost its domestic producers. Beijing also hopes to win so-called market economy status from the EU to help fend off any accusations that it is dumping exports.

Chinese commitments in Europe also could defuse complaints among the EU states about Beijing's persistent trade surplus and human rights record.

Liu Baocheng, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, said China's vows to help Europe could "win favorable opinions of the Chinese government's image and Chinese companies."

"China wants to show it is doing its part to stabilize the global economy and help partners in difficult times," he said. "They think the current financial difficulties experienced by EU countries will be over. The risk is not that high."

Not everyone in Europe is sold. An article last month in the Italian financial daily Il Sole 24 Ore echoed a less sanguine view held in parts of the continent. "Guaranteeing financial support to the whole of Europe in its hour of need, China offers a blank check to Brussels — a hefty one which sooner or later will require payment with interest, and one that Europe cannot refuse to honor."

david.pierson@latimes.com

henry.chu@latimes.com

23 December 2010

The West Making Love to China




Is China being recklessly generous to the West or just being strategic?

Here's the story about China's bailing out the EU with $$$. The Chinaman's burden?

Interestingly, we have been featuring stories of abject penury in China, like the AIDS orphan who lives by himself in a miserable hut in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region. Can't the Chinese government spend some small portion of its massive $2.5 TRILLION in reserve to assist its poor instead of buying junk bonds from the USA and the EU????!!!

18 December 2010

The Definition of Exponential Growth


This is why PR China is the de facto global super-power. It will, likely, overtake the US as the largest economy by 2015. I am China; hear me ROAR...

18 January 2010

China in 2040


http://www.dnaindia.com/money/report_will-china-be-a-monster-economy-by-2040_1105092

Will China be a monster economy by 2040?

Venkatesan Vembu
Friday, June 22, 2007 5:16 IST
Email

Print Print

Share Share

A new study says the country will go from 'poor' to 'super rich'


HONG KONG: A noted China-watcher at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace once said that the "only thing rising faster than China is the hype about China".

A recent research study published by the US National Bureau of Economic Research, America's premier economic research organisation, seems to confirm that sobering statement.

The research paper, authored by Robert Fogel, director of the Center for Population Economics at the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business, makes some breath-taking, mind-numbing projections. Sample these:

*Fogel says that, by 2040, China's GDP (in purchasing power parity terms) will be $123 trillion - or about 40% of global GDP that year - and nearly three times the total output of the entire world in 2000. That figure represents a 2,400% GDP growth since 2000. In fact, says Fogel, in 2040, the Chinese market "will probably be larger than the combined markets of the US, the European Union, India, and Japan." How's that for a monster economy!

*By 2040, reckons Fogel, China's per capita income will reach $85,000 - about twice the projected figure in respect of the European Union! That's a 23-fold increase in 40 years (starting 2000 when the per capita income was about $3,616)!

*In other words, says Fogel, in 40 years (starting 2000), China will have raced right across the economic spectrum from being a 'poor' country to a 'super rich' one!

Fogel's study is also remarkable for one other projection: the decline of Europe. The European Union's share of global GDP will decline from 21% in 2000 to about 5% in 2040, he prophesies. The relative decline of the European Union, implied by its stagnation in population and its modest growth in GDP, is the "most unsettling of the forecasts," says Fogel.

But it is Fogel's projections in respect of China that are the "most provocative", as he himself acknowledges. He then goes on to explain the basis for "so optimistic a view".

One of the critical drivers of China's economic growth over the next generation, argues Fogel, will be the growth in labour productivity that comes of workers shifting from agriculture to other sectors of the economy, such as industry or services. In his estimation, such an inter-industry shift added 3 percentage points to the annual national growth rate from 1978 to 2003. "I expect inter-industry shifts to continue to be an important element in China's growth."

A second reason for Fogel's projection of this meteoric rise is that China is investing heavily in human capital, which, he says, will act as an engine of high economic growth. China, he notes, has invested heavily in rapidly expanding enrolment ratios in both secondary and tertiary education. "Increasing the enrolment ratio in high school to 100% and in college to 50% over the next generation would, by itself, add over 6 percentage points to the annual growth rate," says Fogel.

In making these rosy projections, Fogel airily dismisses fears articulated by other analysts of an economic breakdown or social unrest. Conceding that the inefficiency of many state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in China may be a drag on the economy, Fogel, however, says that "the idea that these inefficient firms will suddenly go bankrupt is far-fetched."

Not only does the government have the finances needed to continue subsidising inefficient firms if it chooses to do so for economic or political reasons, but the burden of these subsidies will also gradually diminish because the share of the industrial output supplied by these underperforming SOEs will gradually decline, he argues.

Additionally, in Fogel's estimation, China's political leaders have a strategy in place for the devolution of power and for co-opting elites. "The government's responsiveness to popular concerns indicates that political stability is likely to remain at the level required for continued long-term economic growth," he concludes.

And what of India? Fogel's straight-line projection of economic growth is somewhat flattering to India as well (but not quite as flattering as it is to China). By 2040, India's GDP (in PPP terms) will be $36,528 billion, which will account for 12% of global economic output. That figure represents a 1,400% increase over GDP in 2000. India's per-capita income too will rise from $2,370 in 2000 to about $24,000 in 2040, according to Fogel's projection.

Fogel explains why he feels more optimistic about China's economic growth than India's. For one, he says, although India has an excellent system of higher education, it lags substantially behind China, South Korea and Asean countries in educational achievement.

Over 40% of the population is still illiterate and gross secondary school enrolment rates in 2002 were less than half the numbers in China.And even the enrolment rate in higher education in India lags behind China's, he points out. Agricultural labour productivity growth rates in India are half that of in China, and given that two-thirds of India's labour force is still in agriculture, this hinders growth of the overall economy, say Fogel.

China's meteoric rise of the past three decades has, of course, proved countless Cassandras wrong. Even so, Fogel's linear extrapolation of human capital trends and his broad-sweep delineation of China's future seem overly optimistic.

As George Mason University professor of economics Tyler Cowen, author of Discover Your Inner Economist, notes half in jest: "Repeat after me: 'China in the 20th century had two major revolutions, a civil war, the Great Leap Forward, mass starvation, the Cultural Revolution, arguably the most tyrannical dictator ever... And now they will go from rags to riches without even a business cycle burp.' I don't think you can do it with a straight face!"


19 September 2009

To Get Rich is Glorious: Chinese Fortune Fuels Real Estate Boom Down Under


MARIKA DOBBIN
The Age, Australia
September 19, 2009

NICK Johnstone is a man on a mission. Next week, the Brighton estate agent will fly to Shanghai with the aim of selling 30 of Melbourne's most expensive homes to Chinese buyers.

It will be the first time a Melbourne agency has attended the China International Luxury Property Show, but it is just one example of a phenomenon that has transformed Australia's residential market.

''Australia is the flavour of the month amongst the Chinese investors,'' Mr Johnstone, 41, said yesterday. ''They love property and there's plenty of money over there so they're good clients to have.''

While Chinese buyers have fuelled the top-end real estate revival, they are also courting controversy, with some local house hunters complaining they are being priced out by foreigners who have no intention of living in their new properties.

A few critics go further, arguing Chinese money is now putting upwards pressure on interest rates.

But you will not catch Mr Johnstone of J. P. Dixon complaining. He has made at least 40 per cent of sales this year to the Chinese. Other agents in the east and south-eastern suburbs have reported the same level of demand.

''We've had several buy properties sight unseen, just over the internet and phone.'' Mr Johnstone said. ''A lady from Shanghai, whose son goes to Wesley College, bought four houses in Brighton from us in two months, worth $20 million.

''They buy them to land bank, not to rent them out. The houses just sit vacant because they are after the capital growth.''

The floodgates opened on foreign investment in March when the Federal Government relaxed its rules on property ownership.

The changes made it easier for foreign companies and temporary residents, such as 12-month business visa holders, foreign students, and their parents, to invest.

Last month, Treasurer Wayne Swan announced a further relaxation of Australia's foreign investment screening to ''help boost Australia's growth''.

But the big spend-up is being fuelled by more than just Australian policy change.

Armadale entrepreneur Barry Jan, who runs property shopping tours from China to Australia, said the Communist Party had had an about-face on citizens investing their wealth overseas. ''People are investing now in case they can't get their money out later,'' he said.

Kew property adviser Monique Wakelin said many Chinese had come to see Australian property as a stable hedge against global economic tumult and the potential devaluation of the yuan.

''They are looking for avenues to protect at least part of their wealth, and A-grade Melbourne residential property fits the bill.'' The confluence of events has seen Chinese money inflating prices for top-end homes by at least 10 per cent in a matter of months, according to Boroondara agent James Connell from Marshall White.

''Chinese people have effectively kick-started our economy and underpinned all our housing values in inner Melbourne,'' he said.

Keen to cash in on the boom, Marshall White, J. P. Dixon and other big agencies such as Jellis Craig are hastily establishing connections with offshore accounts, lawyers and businessmen to funnel a stream of buyers into Melbourne.

Also in hot demand are Mandarin-speaking Melbourne real estate agents and property lawyers.

Meanwhile, Australia's largest developers - including Australand, Central Equity, Simonds, Becton - are setting up offices in China and Hong Kong to spruik off-the-plan developments.

And an industry of ''Australian property and migration'' exhibitions has burgeoned in the cities and mining towns, such as Taiyuan, attracting hundreds of people.

Yet all the evidence put forward about the property revolution is so far anecdotal because there is no measure being kept on the amount of investment by temporary residents in residential property.

The Government's March law change abolished mandatory reporting of such acquisitions in a bid to ''enhance flexibility in the market''.

What is certain is that in the past financial year before the change, foreign investment in Australian residential property increased by a third to $20.4 billion from the year before. Victoria attracted 21 per cent of that investment, according to the Foreign Investment Review Board's annual report released last month.


02 September 2009

China's Renminbi to be People's Currency Worldwide?


China pushing yuan as global currency

Font size:

Toronto, ON, Canada, — China and the United States held talks on strategic and economic matters in Washington on July 27 and 28, which both sides declared a success. However, such talks are pointless unless the basic issues of balanced trade and the value of the Chinese yuan are on the agenda.

Now might be a good time for China to push its currency, the yuan, as a global currency. It has US$2 trillion in reserves in the United States, making the powerful nation its debtor. It also has a list of other debtors that includes Europe. China holds all the cards to be a powerful global power.

The United States and Europe have dug their own graves with their financial excesses, an emphasis on globalization and an unnecessary war in Iraq. If it pushed hard, China could make the yuan the gobal currency.

While the United States and Europe were busy showing off their wealth and power for the last 20 years, China was taking away all the Western world’s manufacturing. This resulted in the West importing everything from socks to desktops from China – which imported next to nothing.

When the United States and Europe were struck by the financial meltdown in 2008, they turned to China for cash.

China’s trade surplus rose from a mere US$18 billion in 1999 to a staggering US$297 billion in 2008, thanks to its low-value currency. Its trade has made China the world’s manufacturing giant and its strong cash reserves have given it power to manipulate world opinion.

In 2007 China hinted at its intention to promote the yuan as an alternate reserve currency. And at last month’s G-8 Summit in Italy China pushed for enhanced status for the yuan. While Russia endorsed the idea, there was lukewarm support from both India and Brazil.

Although high-ranking U.S. government officials have visited Beijing to discuss the issue, President Barack Obama’s administration has been more engaged with domestic issues like the recession and rising unemployment than Beijing’s ambition to promote its currency.

Due to the global recession, the gross domestic product of the West is predicted to drop by 3 to 4 percent. In comparison, although China’s GDP has also been hit by the recession, its manufacturing sector and US$2 trillion in cash reserves – mostly loaned out to other countries –place it in a commanding position. China’s growing military might also places it in a more dominant position in the world.

The next two years will be a period of “rest and recovery” for the United States and other world economies. Although China has suffered on the export front, its economy is still humming at the rate of 6-7 percent annually. It has put its unemployed to work with its own version of a stimulus package, and surplus goods that could not be exported have been diverted for local consumption.

Since the end of World War II the West has been arrogant and overconfident. Western countries have ignored talk of reducing the role of the dollar and giving a greater role to the yuan or any other currency. But with almost all Anglo-Saxon economies in bad shape, they may have no choice.

China recently signed currency swap deals – in which dues are settled in yuan instead of the U.S. dollar – with Indonesia, Malaysia, South Korea, Brazil and Russia. These countries support the idea of reducing the U.S. dollar’s dominance in world finance and business. This is the first in a series of steps China plans to upgrade the yuan and make it fully convertible in global financial markets.

The rise of the dollar was Europe’s gift to the new world after World Wars I and II. Until then the British pound was the world currency for trade, commerce and international transactions. When the British position began to erode after the wars, the United States outmaneuvered Britain into transferring international banking transactions to the United States. As a result its military power began to grow by leaps and bounds.

Then came the Cold War. Europe submitted to U.S. machinations and yielded all power. The value of the dollar rose and it maintained its lofty position until about 1990, with massive U.S. government support. The whole world recognized it and every nation, including oil producers, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, India and China, began maintaining U.S. dollar accounts.

Then China emerged on the world economic stage. The United States did not anticipate that China would take away its entire manufacturing sector in such a short time. Initially, the United States transferred its labor-intensive smokestack manufacturing to China. But once the floodgates opened, there was no stopping China.

U.S. President Bill Clinton assisted this process, calling it prosperity. Unfortunately that was only on paper, with financial gains in stocks, bonds and other speculative markets proving worthless in 2008.

Next, after the 9/11 terror attacks former President George W. Bush’s administration got busy fighting wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, putting the economy into a low-priority lane. The country’s surplus cash – which actually belonged to oil producers, China, India and Japan – was made available to domestic consumers by way of cut-rate mortgages. Within eight years post-9/11, the U.S. economy and its mighty dollar suffered catastrophic losses.

Now China is in a position to take the yuan to the world stage, similar to the U.S. dollar. When the yuan becomes fully convertible it will move into the world league.

However, there is an inherent weakness in the Chinese economy that may muddy the water. Its exports depend on the goodwill of the West. If those markets close, China’s economy could fall flat. The rest of the world cannot absorb Chinese exports the way the United States does. Also, the West may opt to rebuild and redevelop its manufacturing base, like India, Indonesia and Brazil, which will be a big setback for the yuan. Although China may resist such moves, this would not help its cause in the face of a determined effort by the West.

Chinese exports have benefited from the low value of the yuan, which has not been revalued in the last ten years to reflect the current status of China’s economy. If it is revalued upward by 15 to 20 percent, then 30 percent of Chinese exports will become pricey. Demand will drop and so will exports.

In such a scenario, other countries may step in to fill the void. India is in line, with massive cash at its disposal; it had US$40 billion from foreign direct investment and foreign institutional investors, and another US$40 billion in remittances from abroad in 2008. India could build a manufacturing base as fast as China did in the last 20 years. There is only one drawback in this scenario: the West has not fully realized the implications of China’s moves.

China will eventually move to displace the dollar and replace it with the yuan as the world currency. Such a move could deal a painful blow to the United States unless it starts moving manufacturing back from China and revisits the yuan-dollar relationship.

--

(Hari Sud is a retired vice president of C-I-L Inc., a former investment strategies analyst and international relations manager. A graduate of Punjab University and the University of Missouri, he has lived in Canada for the past 34 years. ©Copyright Hari Sud.)